Home Archiveaaa News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 16, Issue 1, 2024
Pages: 427 - 434
Research paper
Civil Engineering Editor: Ognjen Mijatović
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 47
PDF Downloads: 44
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Published: 12.06.2024. Research paper Civil Engineering Editor: Ognjen Mijatović

TORSIONAL IRREGULATITY PROVISIONS FOR BUILDINGS IN MODERN CODES

By
Ivan Mrdak ,
Ivan Mrdak
Contact Ivan Mrdak

Civil Engineering Faculty, University of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro

Marina Rakočević
Marina Rakočević

Civil engineering faculty, University of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro

Abstract

It has been observed that in earthquake-affected areas, structures with a configuration classified as torsionally irregular are more prone to damage than regular structures. Modern seismic provisions have introduced criteria for determining if the structure is torsionally sensitive and guidelines for designing them. Eurocode 8 prescribes criterion which is based on characteristics of natural vibrations of building while in most of the other regulations criterion is based on comparison of maximum and average story drift. The assessment and comparison of provisions for torsionally irregularity is performed on 18 structures. Six layouts of structure were created by varying the position of structural elements in order to create different levels of torsional irregularity. Because of the different approach in the classification of building regarding torsional irregularity it is noted that there are conflicting results in different regulations.  

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.